Vice President Hillary Clinton?


It’s a cruel, cruel world when a decent Vice President is in talks of being ousted from a national ticket, but rumors are swirling that this summer, VP Joe Biden will be replaced by Secretary of State Hillary Clinton as the President’s running mate.

Whether Biden will simply retire or the two will switch places with the former Delaware Senator taking the helm of the State Department is up for debate, but one thing is for certain: the ticket would be far much stronger with Clinton in the co-pilot’s seat than Biden.

This isn’t to say that Biden has done a bad job. By most accounts, he’s been a critical “point man” on the President’s team, a sort of glue that coalesced the Cabinet early on. He’s also been the main go-to official on interaction with Iraqi leadership, visiting the country several times to do everything from expressing the Administration’s expectations of Iraq’s governmental progress to helping reinstate banned candidates from the country’s 2010 elections.

But let’s be honest here: Joe Biden isn’t capable of winning at the top of the ticket in 2016. Yes, he’s lovable, a foreign policy expert, and a mainstay of Democratic statesmanship for four decades, but he’s also gaffe-prone, lacks gravitas, and, well, he doesn’t have that “x-factor” that propels a national figure to the White House. He has the same problem that Sen. John Kerry had in 2004: an impressive resume but nothing that excites the base.

Clinton, on the other hand, has steadily been boosting her reputation among, well, everyone since she was elected senator in 2000. She’s grown on some conservatives (mainly her Senate colleagues) and even has received high marks from top military officials. The Hillary Clinton of 1994’s disastrous Clinton Health Care Plan looks nothing like our modern Secretary of State. Her approval rating has continuously hovered in the low-60s for more than a year, far above VP Biden’s.

The point is that we need a natural successor to President Obama in 2016, and right now, Biden, for all  his wonderful qualities, doesn’t hold a candle to the statesmanship and game-changing abilities Hillary Clinton would bring to the table.

The problem is that the President seems stuck on carrying Biden with him for the long haul. According to the Vice President, Obama has already asked him to run with him for re-election, and the online campaign store appears to be symbolic confirmation of this as its packed with Obama-Biden gear for long road to November.

And if it does turn out that Biden stays on the ticket, we’re missing an incredible opportunity to change history. Yes, Clinton could be our country’s first woman president, but more importantly, she’s the type of person that seems to scream destiny.

You think President Obama is good? Imagine President Hillary Clinton.


Follow me on Twitter:

And Facebook:

Donate via PayPal: Thank you!



6 thoughts on “Vice President Hillary Clinton?

  1. Jake says:

    Clinton serves a MUCH more important and valuable role as SOS, especially the way the world is these days. VP is a ‘nothing’ role. That’s the reality of it, but the perception somehow continues to be different.

  2. Gina Hayes says:

    YES YES YES!!!!!
    do you know how hard millions of dems would work to make sure they won this Nov.??? This would unify us in the BIGGEST way…

  3. Jason Johnson says:

    Wow…If true it is a big deal….Please state sources!

  4. Jake says:

    It makes complete sense politically, if not practically. I’m all for it if it’s what it takes to ensure victory in November.

  5. I’d rather keep Hillary as Secy of State. I can’t imagine Biden doing a better job than her in that post, and he has SO much experience in the Senate, I also can’t imagine her doing a better job than him as VP. Gaffe-prone or not, people who suggest Hillary Clinton as VP are completely missing the value Joe Biden brings to the team. No, Obama should leave things as they are. And heck, at this stage, he doesn’t need the added oomph of having Hillary as VP — the GOP primaries are doing most of his job for him. Even if Romney, who is the best candidate out there, gets the nod, let’s not kid ourselves: the election isn’t about getting Democrats to vote for an incumbent Democrat, it’s about getting INDEPENDENTS to vote for the incumbent Democrat. And the independents’ minds are being shaped by the ugliness we are seeing every single day. Romney still has a chance if he brings a solid, sober, non-social-conservative running mate on board, but my guess is that the national GOP will force him, just as they forced McCain, to take on a social conservative running mate to appeal to evangelical voters. Santorum or Gingrich are at the top of the list, with Santorum probably ahead of Gingrich simply because he’s not so blatantly a hypocrite when it comes to practicing what he preaches. If Romney caves, independents will leave him in droves for the same reasons they left McCain — they do not want a religious fanatic to be next in line for the presidency. [They may leave in smaller droves, though, because at least Santorum can claim national electoral experience and he’s a much more capable & committed campaigner than Sarah Palin was—at least where the “do your homework” aspect is concerned!]. If Romney insists on a socially moderate running mate, the evangelicals (who are already suspicious of Romney’s Mormonism) will stay home. Either way, Romney loses. So why risk riling up the Clinton-hating ultra conservatives by putting Hillary Clinton in as VP? It’s not a net benefit to the nation OR the campaign.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: